Poll: (3 opt's) re. Negative Karma / Negative Reputation

[Chip (OP)]

no mods or admins are messing with rep.

Nark is right - we continue with the system as it is now.

we are all equals when it comes to the rep. system and our earlier neg. rep has been carried forward.

have faith.

[Zoops]

I think you screwed up the question wording again, whoever wrote it:

Why would you get negative rep points deducted from your own negative rep by giving negative rep to someone else? I think you meant to say positive rep points would be deducted from your own positive points.

Is that like multiplying negative numbers? You get a positive number [e.g. (-1)(-1)=1]??

Didn't I see your post count somewhere around 400-something a couple days ago, Chipper? And now it's over 900...Damn homie be puttin in some WORK!

[Z]

no mods or admins are messing with rep.

Nark is right - we continue with the system as it is now.

we are all equals when it comes to the rep. system and our earlier neg. rep has been carried forward.

have faith.

Fair enough.  You might notice that some members still have entirely negative rep.

I just noticed nark jump from 0 to 6 or whatever as soon as you made the change and figured he had done it again. 

I liked not having every click shown, and seeing where it came from as well.  I don't know what is possible in smf.

[Chip (OP)]

if you see a member with neg rep and you like them and what they say then you can help fix that.

if anybody abuses the rep. system, and i know it's a simple one, then let us know please.

[Narkotikon]

no mods or admins are messing with rep.

Nark is right - we continue with the system as it is now.

we are all equals when it comes to the rep. system and our earlier neg. rep has been carried forward.

have faith.

Fair enough.  You might notice that some members still have entirely negative rep.

I just noticed nark jump from 0 to 6 or whatever as soon as you made the change and figured he had done it again. 

I liked not having every click shown, and seeing where it came from as well.  I don't know what is possible in smf.

I didn't add 6 points to my own account.

I got 6 after my debate with Jdub (I assume it was from that). 

In all honesty, if people are going to keep accusing me of manipulating my rep, I'd rather just turn the damned thing off for my account.

I've apologized, listened to other people's concerns and suggestions in my apology thread, adopted those changes, and have tried to move on with this new system.  Aside from those, I don't think there's anything I could do to please anyone.  It is what it is. 

I'll say it again, I'm not changing my rep.  No one else is either.  This is a new, reformed rep system IMO.  Rep 2.0.  Let's all move past this. 

[Chip (OP)]

despite Nark's special talent of attracting negative rep, so too can it be said for his even more special talent of obtaining positive rep.

sure, his views can be polarising but he's generally quite popular.

i can attest to the fact that he earned them.

[Chip (OP)]

this poll now locked and superceded by the Advanced Reputation System poll at http://forum.drugs-and-users.org/index.php/topic,1256.0.html

topic closed.