dopetalk does not endorse any advertised product nor does it accept any liability for it's use or misuse

This website has run out of funding so feel free to contribute if you can afford it (see footer)

Author Topic: Injectors: NUAA scans - Paraphernalia (Filtering)  (Read 1355 times)

andrew

  • Guest
Injectors: NUAA scans - Paraphernalia (Filtering)
« on: December 23, 2014, 06:47:13 PM »
User's News Volume 79
« Last Edit: June 01, 2015, 11:20:15 PM by Chipper »
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline makita

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Location:
  • Posts: 291
  • Reputation Power: 26
  • makita is now quite familiar.makita is now quite familiar.
  • Last Login:March 07, 2019, 05:50:39 PM
Re: Injectors: NUAA scans - Paraphernalia (Filtering)
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2015, 11:05:18 PM »
I am really surprised with the MSContin results, that there's only a what, approx 15% difference in particulates between that cloudy ass solution with the cotton ball filter and the clear solution with the wheel filter?  I was expecting much more of a difference. 

Maybe its because it doesn't take relative SIZE of particulates into account (just that they are big enough to clog vessels)...perhaps that is where the real difference lies, between really big ones and much smaller ones. 
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
something something drug war, social justice blah blah

Offline Chip

  • Server Admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Location: Australia
  • Posts: 6518
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • Chip has hidden their reputation power
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 07:54:15 AM
  • Deeply Confused Learner
  • Profession: IT Engineer
Re: Injectors: NUAA scans - Paraphernalia (Filtering)
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2015, 11:43:40 AM »
makita, I was baffled by their findings and that's why I scanned that article.

it shows us that we aren't always assuming facts.
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I do not condone or support any illegal activities. All information is for theoretical discussion and wonder.
All activities discussed are considered fictional and hypothetical. Information of all discussion has been derived from online research and in the spirit of personal Freedom.

Tags:
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
1294 Views
Last post December 23, 2014, 06:45:28 PM
by andrew
0 Replies
1218 Views
Last post May 28, 2019, 07:23:22 PM
by Chip


dopetalk does not endorse any advertised product nor does it accept any liability for it's use or misuse





TERMS AND CONDITIONS

In no event will d&u or any person involved in creating, producing, or distributing site information be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, special or consequential damages arising out of the use of or inability to use d&u. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless d&u, its domain founders, sponsors, maintainers, server administrators, volunteers and contributors from and against all liability, claims, damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from the use of any part of the d&u site.


TO USE THIS WEBSITE YOU MUST AGREE TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ABOVE


Founded December 2014
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal