Only thing I disagreed with in that article was the moral equation of mandates to inoculate 12-year old girls against HPV (a sexually transmitted disease) with drug legalization efforts. On its face, at first blush, the idea of mandatory HPV vaccination seems to be a good one, but I think the comparison made is inexact. Because it should be optional whether a parent wants to give their too-young-for-sexual-activity daughter a vaccine against a sexually transmitted disease. Just like it should be optional for one to take mind-altering drugs.
Rock fishing, which sounds very dangerous, and not regulated at all, seems to be a more apt comparison to make.
What is rock fishing anyway? I'm going to look it up.