dopetalk does not endorse any advertised product nor does it accept any liability for it's use or misuse

This website has run out of funding so feel free to contribute if you can afford it (see footer)

Author Topic: crack, heroin and race  (Read 1233 times)

Z

  • Guest
crack, heroin and race
« on: August 14, 2015, 07:19:28 AM »
From: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/08/crack-heroin-and-race/401015/

How White Users Made Heroin a Public-Health Problem

In the past, when users of the drug were disproportionately black, they faced severe punishments.


Heroin use and abuse in America has dramatically increased over the past decade.  Between 2006 and 2013, federal records reveal that the number of first-time heroin users doubled from 90,000 to 169,000. Some of those users, no doubt, already are gone. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention announced last month that the rate of deadly heroin overdoses nearly quadrupled between 2002 and 2013.

These troubling figures, and a spate of more recent stories and daunting statistics, have prompted officials across the country to implement bold new policies and practices designed to reduce the harm of heroin use. Although there has been some push to enhance criminal sanctions to combat the surge, much of the institutional reaction to the renewed popularity of the drug has sounded in the realm of medicine, not law.

One public official after another, in states both “red” and “blue,” has pressed in recent years to treat increased heroin use as a public-safety problem as opposed to a criminal-justice matter best left to police, prosecutors, and judges. This is good news. But it forms a vivid contrast with the harsh reaction a generation ago to the sudden rise in the use of crack cocaine, and from the harsh reaction two generations ago to another heroin epidemic.


What accounts for the differences? Clearly policymakers know more today than they did then about the societal costs of waging a war on drugs, and dispatching low-level, nonviolent drug offenders to prison for decades. The contemporary criminal-justice system places more emphasis on treatment and reform than it did, say, during the Reagan years or when New York’s draconian “Rockefeller laws” were passed in the 1970s. But there may be another explanation for the less hysterical reaction, one that few policymakers have been willing to acknowledge: race.

Some experts and researchers see, in the different responses to these drug epidemics, further proof of America’s racial divide. Are policymakers going easier today on heroin users (white and often affluent) than their elected predecessors did a generation ago when confronted with crack addicts who were largely black, disenfranchised, and economically bereft? Can we explain the disparate response to the “black” heroin epidemic of the 1960s, in which its use and violent crime were commingled in the public consciousness, and the white heroin “epidemic” today, in which its use is considered a disease to be treated or cured, without using race as part of our explanation?


Advertisement



Marc Mauer, the executive director of the Sentencing Project, a group that targets racial disparities in the criminal-justice system, has been following this issue closely for decades. He agrees there is strong historical precedent for comparing the crises through the prism of race:


The response to the rise in heroin use follows patterns we've seen over decades of drug scares. When the perception of the user population is primarily people of color, then the response is to demonize and punish. When it's white, then we search for answers. Think of the difference between marijuana attitudes in the "reefer madness" days of the 1930s when the drug was perceived to be used in the "racy" parts of town, and then the 1960s (white) college town explosion in use.

It is now axiomatic that although the crack epidemic of the 1980s devastated communities of color, the legal and political responses to the crisis compounded the tragedy. Crack was an inner-city drug, a street-corner drug, a drug of gangs and guns that white America largely experienced from a distance. Powder cocaine, the more expensive version of the drug, found its way to more affluent users. The federal Anti-Drug Abuse Act, passed in 1986, imposed mandatory-minimum sentences that were far harsher on users of crack cocaine than on those found with the drug in powdered form. The Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 reduced that disparity in sentencing from 100:1 to 18:1, but that remains a striking gap.

Indeed, the harsh, punitive reaction to the crack era was the result of mythology about its use, and its users, that later turned out to be false, says Jeffrey Fagan, a Columbia University professor who has long studied the intersection of criminal justice and race. “It was instantly addictive, it created ‘superpredators,’ you became a sexual deviant, especially if you were a woman, it destroyed maternal instincts,” he said. All of that nonsense led to the draconian sentencing laws associated with crack use in the 1980s, Fagan told me.

And that, Fagan says, was the sequel to another criminal-justice crackdown that had taken place decades earlier. A surge in heroin use among blacks in the 1960s was blamed for a rise in violent crime, and provoked a harsh response.

By contrast to those earlier drug crises, the heroin epidemic of the 21st century is largely a white person’s scourge. The Center for Disease Control says the cheap, easily accessible drug is attracting affluent suburbanites and women. Nearly 90 percent of the people who tried heroin for the first time in the past decade are white, according to a study published in JAMA Psychiatry in July 2014, and there is no reason to believe the trend has eased since then. Said the researchers:


Heroin use has changed from an inner-city, minority-centered problem to one that has a more widespread geographical distribution, involving primarily white men and women in their late 20s living outside of large urban areas.

The cause for this may be simple. White people addicted to prescription opiates, the sorts of drugs they could conveniently get from a friendly doctor or pharmacist, are finding heroin an obvious (and cheap) substitute now that law-enforcement officials have cracked down on those opiates. The hottest fronts in this war now can be seen in rural states like Vermont and in suburban areas that largely missed the ravages of the crack craze.

And politicians on both sides of the aisle clearly are paying attention to what researchers diplomatically call the “changing face of heroin use.” According to the Pew Charitable Trusts, lawmakers in at least 24 states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws in the past few years that make naloxone, a prescription drug that helps counter the effect of a heroin overdose, more broadly available. Just three weeks ago, Ohio Governor John Kasich, a Republican presidential candidate, signed emergency legislation to make naxolone available without a prescription.

His neighbor in Kentucky, Senator Rand Paul, another Republican running for the White House, introduced the Recovery Enhancement for Addiction Treatment Act earlier this year. It would make it easier for doctors to treat heroin users with a drug called buprenorphine. Nearly two-dozen states have also passed laws that protect “good Samaritans” who alert doctors or nurses to heroin overdoses.

Such public-health responses were not necessarily unthinkable during the crack-cocaine wave of the 1980s or the heroin epidemic of the 1960s. But the limited public-health measures adopted during those eras were overshadowed by more punitive responses to those crises. Can you imagine the Congress and the White House of 1985 debating a “Recovery Enhancement for Addiction Act” for crack users? Mauer remembers instead the brutal mandatory-sentencing laws of that era sweeping toward passage in Congress in near-record time. What accounts for the difference? “I don’t think that’s only because we are more thoughtful today,” Mauer said.

About the Author
Andrew Cohen is a contributing editor at The Atlantic. He is a legal analyst for 60 Minutes and CBS Radio News, a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice, and commentary editor at The Marshall Project.

friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Narkotikon

  • Honest
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • SA_Chat+
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Location: USA
  • Posts: 1193
  • Reputation Power: 50
  • Narkotikon has got loads of potential.Narkotikon has got loads of potential.Narkotikon has got loads of potential.Narkotikon has got loads of potential.Narkotikon has got loads of potential.
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:March 28, 2016, 11:31:11 PM
  • Keeping Them Honest
Re: crack, heroin and race
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2015, 01:51:35 PM »
Powdered heroin is to blame too.  It's changed races from dark brown to almost white.   ;D   Bad joke.

Seriously though, this is a good point.  America doesn't like to talk about race.  It usually gets pushed under the rug.  Lawmakers have to recognize this, at least I'd hope so, but they won't publicly acknowledge it. 

If they really wanted to help heroin addicts, they'd expand buprenorphine and methadone use.  Ideally even adding other opiates into the mix.  Opiate addiction is notoriously bad for relapse rates when the traditional abstinence method is followed. 
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Transparency is necessary to ensure decent staff members get elected. Members need to know when staff are misbehaving, so members can be informed voters.

Offline Der Alte Krieger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • SA_Chat+
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Location:
  • Posts: 131
  • Reputation Power: 7
  • Der Alte Krieger is new on the scene.
  • Last Login:April 29, 2020, 03:38:00 AM
  • Welcome to our community forum ...
Re: crack, heroin and race
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2015, 10:09:33 PM »
I feel that it's more class than race, just like a lot of other things.

They hand out pretty harsh sentences to the white trash crack heads around here that cant afford a good lawyer.

It would be interesting to see a breakdown of quality of legal representation in identical cases and see if it still followed a color line

If that makes any sense, I been up all last night watching the meteors
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline Griffin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Location:
  • Posts: 948
  • Reputation Power: 34
  • Griffin is working their way up.Griffin is working their way up.Griffin is working their way up.
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:February 29, 2020, 09:21:12 PM
  • Welcome to our community forum ...
Re: crack, heroin and race
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2015, 11:05:12 PM »
I watched the movie caged animal last night and it said in the beginning that almost 3/4 of the black prison population were in for drug offenses. The judicial system still seems very racist to me, I was in a little podunk county jail a few months ago and there were only 2 black inmates and they were both in my pod. Every week the guards would rush in and lock them down for 1-3 days for doing what the white people were doing all the time. Like the white guys would be working out with out a shirt on and then when the black guys would do it the c/o's would rush in and lock them down. Same thing with talking to the other pods through the window the white guys would be doing it all day then one black guy would come up and say something and the guards would rush in to lock them down.
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline jdub

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • SA_Chat+
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Location:
  • Posts: 282
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • jdub has hidden their reputation power
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:April 25, 2018, 03:39:20 AM
  • Welcome to our community forum ...
Re: crack, heroin and race
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2015, 11:48:00 PM »
I think one thing that wasn't addressed is the nature of the drugs themselves. There aren't really the same "public health options" for crack eg. needle exchanges, narcan, methadone/ suboxone, etc.

But yeah, let's end the drug war.
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Offline makita

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Location:
  • Posts: 291
  • Reputation Power: 26
  • makita is now quite familiar.makita is now quite familiar.
  • Last Login:March 07, 2019, 05:50:39 PM
Re: crack, heroin and race
« Reply #5 on: August 21, 2015, 02:29:40 AM »
I think one thing that wasn't addressed is the nature of the drugs themselves. There aren't really the same "public health options" for crack eg. needle exchanges, narcan, methadone/ suboxone, etc.

But yeah, let's end the drug war.

I think that's more proof of the article's premise, though.  Those pub health options were developed because there were at least some people who saw heroin use as a medical issue and cared about the using population (as well as all the fallout to the rest of society that happens when the using population isn't cared for in some way).  If there had been the same approach with crack maybe there would be some equivalent harm reduction options--at the very least giving out free pipes and citric acid at needle exchanges, maybe even the development of a stimulant type drug for detox or maintenance purposes.  I know cocaine doesn't have the same extended withdrawal syndrome that opioids do but it's more the depression and craving and other issues that come from long term use (sort of like PAWS) that keep a user coming back after they've been through the come down.  Im sure a drug could be developed, or an already available drug utilized, to help with that if society gave enough of a shit back when there was an epidemic.
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
something something drug war, social justice blah blah

Offline Griffin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2015
  • Location:
  • Posts: 948
  • Reputation Power: 34
  • Griffin is working their way up.Griffin is working their way up.Griffin is working their way up.
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:February 29, 2020, 09:21:12 PM
  • Welcome to our community forum ...
Re: crack, heroin and race
« Reply #6 on: August 21, 2015, 06:13:25 AM »
jdub you make a great point, the meth problem is quite crazy and in prison and jails it seems that more people are in for meth related offenses than for opiates. I have seen very little about any treatment options or things to help people with addictions to meth and other stimulants. Even when watching shows about addiction where they show rehabs and such the treatment plans for people addicted to stimulants is very vague as opposed to opiate addiction.
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
like
0
dislike
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Tags:
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
1 Replies
2926 Views
Last post July 15, 2015, 02:14:57 PM
by Narkotikon
7 Replies
5256 Views
Last post August 17, 2015, 10:29:53 AM
by Narkotikon
1 Replies
3989 Views
Last post September 15, 2015, 02:20:37 PM
by Narkotikon
2 Replies
3855 Views
Last post October 18, 2015, 11:43:29 AM
by nick
16 Replies
61126 Views
Last post October 27, 2019, 03:59:07 AM
by nosanks
17 Replies
22041 Views
Last post June 15, 2016, 10:09:55 AM
by Pantopon Pete
0 Replies
2513 Views
Last post July 13, 2016, 09:59:37 AM
by Chip
0 Replies
2574 Views
Last post December 04, 2017, 03:40:17 AM
by Chip
0 Replies
1966 Views
Last post June 20, 2018, 07:57:41 AM
by Chip
0 Replies
326 Views
Last post May 30, 2021, 06:38:27 PM
by Chip


dopetalk does not endorse any advertised product nor does it accept any liability for it's use or misuse





TERMS AND CONDITIONS

In no event will d&u or any person involved in creating, producing, or distributing site information be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, special or consequential damages arising out of the use of or inability to use d&u. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless d&u, its domain founders, sponsors, maintainers, server administrators, volunteers and contributors from and against all liability, claims, damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from the use of any part of the d&u site.


TO USE THIS WEBSITE YOU MUST AGREE TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ABOVE


Founded December 2014
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal