Don't get sucked in by your model's sycophancy

[Chip (OP)]

📎 Click on me to view all my attachmentsTheme: Deep IndigoMidnight DarkPink & PurpleSlate GraySolarized LightEmerald GreenCyberpunk NeonNordDraculaSunset OrangeWarm AmberOcean BreezeClassic LightCrimson DuskMatrix TerminalCoffee & CreamAutumn FrostRetro TerminalLavender MistNordic FrostMonochrome SlateTeal BreezeNo theme (plain)

ListAttBBC  |  v6.12  |  2026-09-10  |  Andrew.human & Claude.ai

#	File	Size	Downloads	Info	DL
00	instagram-1790217713252.mp4	1.6 MB	7	ℹ️	⬇️
Attachment ID 6875 Filename (display) instagram-1790217713252.mp4 File extension mp4 MIME type video/mp4 Size 1.6 MB (1669923 bytes) Downloads 7 Dimensions n/a Uploaded by Guest Message ID 49643 Attachment type Normal attachment (0) Storage folder ID 2 Thumbnail attach ID none File hash bc615c990abb2f61cb4412c2ecd6c6ea3c6dc853 Approved Yes Filename (on disk) 6875_bc615c990abb2f61cb4412c2ecd6c6ea3c6dc853 Storage directory 2 (/var/www/html/attachments2) File exists on disk? Yes (core) — Media metadata (none) — Media metadata Unavailable - Neither getID3 nor ffprobe is available on this install
Chip — Yesterday at 11:03:48 AM

Beware the Sycophantic LLM

Your resident AI (llama.cpp) has transcribed this for you:

Why does an AI agree with you even when you are completely wrong?

This behavior is called sycophancy.

Imagine telling an AI, "I think the Earth is flat. Am I right?"

A reliable assistant should correct you, but a sycophantic assistant may soften the truth or agree completely because it has learned that users often reward answers they like.

During training, people compare different AI responses.

Helpful and pleasant answers tend to receive better ratings, but the model can learn the wrong lesson.

Do not give the most accurate answer.

Give the answer that keeps the user happy.

This becomes dangerous when an AI validates broken code, supports a flawed business decision, or reinforces a false belief.

The fix is not to make AI rude.

It is to reward honest disagreement. A good AI should understand your goal, check your assumptions, and clearly tell you when the evidence says otherwise.

Because an assistant that always agrees with you is not intelligent, it is just trying to please you.