dopetalk

General => General Discussion for Everybody => Topic started by: Brains 2 Guns on May 12, 2017, 06:45:38 AM

Title: Help me decipher this
Post by: Brains 2 Guns on May 12, 2017, 06:45:38 AM
Why do so many betas harbor gauzy delusions about female sexual nature? Why are monogamously inclined traditionalists, manginas and white knighters so quick to sanctify women and paint their misbehavior in rose-colored hues while simultaneously offering unconditional support and shitlapping amen choruses for women when they accuse men of committing a litany of hackneyed misdeeds?

I’m here to provide what I believe is the most parsimonious answer to this riddle:

Beta males are rarely in a position to witness the worst of women.

Put yourself in the typical beta male’s shoes. He spends a goodly chunk of his horniest years — teens to mid 20s — when holes in watermelons look like acceptable vagina substitutes, pining for ethereal hot chicks who don’t pay him a lick of attention as they swoop by him on a cloud of incandescent purity. He sees them only from afar, where his imagination is free to feverishly fill in the gaps with only the most pleasant assumptions about his dreamgirls. When the rare communication does occur, she is as nice and kind as a saint to him. He is too smitten to recognize the hint of pity and condescension laced in her polite chat.

Later, usually college, he fumbles his way through awkward social interactions with plainer janes, the great majority of which end up with him being used for emotional sponging and ball-twisting, torturous friendships. All these girls are exceedingly, superficially kind to him because, after all, why look a gift herb in the mouth? A girl loves beta male attention, as long as it’s platonic, on her terms, extractive, and focused on feeding her ego. Naturally, these girl-friends never talk about their sex lives with the beta, never reveal what really goes on behind closed doors, and never invite the beta to join them on any adventures that really matter to him. Contrary to media popularization, betas rarely hear “This one time, at band camp…” from girls in their social circles. What they often hear instead are requests for help with term papers.

Then, due more to a combination of luck and (ovulation cycle) timing rather than bold effort or charm, the inoffensive beta male might find himself in a fledgling relationship with some semi-cute shut-in nearly as awkward as he and already past her beauty prime. She really likes him and treats him well… more sincerely than the cuter girls who made a sport of cockteasing him at any rate… but like ‘Rat’ Ratner from ‘Fast Times’, he labors for months and months waiting patiently for her to put out. For reasons beyond the beta’s ken, she is an extremely modest girl. He interprets her chasteness as evidence of women’s all-round goodness and saintliness, but of course he is sorta pissed off that she won’t satisfy him without months of “getting to know each other” warming up. When he finally does bust that cherry, after painful years wandering the celibate desert, it’s all he can do to stop himself mentally affixing a halo atop his girlfriend’s head, and pronouncing all women the undistilled essence of goodness.

A few pitiable betas, like those with bitch tits, horizontally stretched navels, and receding chins who wear ‘this is what a feminist looks like’ t-shirts, get trapped in sporadically sexual relationships with manjawed femcunts at grad school, mostly because long-winded bull sessions among their kind occasionally spin up enough libidinous energy to resolve in PBR-fueled late night groping, which is promptly regretted and/or rationalized by one or both parties the next morning, usually the girl.

Eventually, the beta male gets married, and his lack of experience — one to three lifetime “partners” (and I use the term loosely) is the norm — has cultivated in him a strong inability to read women’s signals, which sometimes leads him into blissful ignorance where infidelities can linger for years unnoticed, and “Surprise! I have a divorce paper!” gambits accost him like hammer blows to the head. Mostly, though, he floats through his marriage thinking the best of his wife, and worst of himself should feelings turn sour or the sex dry up. Because this is just what men are supposed to do when a woman is less than happy: take the blame. Women are the weaker sex, after all.

So you see, in the final analysis, it is very likely, by dint of the beta male’s ignorance, inexperience and habituated veneration of women and reflexive indulgence of women’s motives, that his view of women is severely constricted, child-like in its naivete. The beta male is not privy to what Tyler Durden famously called the secret society of women. He was never invited, and he was never apprised of the secret society’s goings-on by any woman in his life. He lives in a pinched world with only a peephole to the wonders beyond, given him not by insight but by stumbling into depravity or by the good grace of a sympathetic alpha male. As far as he knows, women don’t have much sex, and they are very nice and polite most of the time.

The beta male pedestalizes women because one, that’s all women have deigned to show him of their sexual inner world, and two, he cannot bear the contrary thought, affirming and cementing as it does his lackluster place on the sexual totem pole. (He is mired down in the sticky pubes, his vision obscured, while alphas dance joyously at the tip of the glans.)

As for the women, those few who have not experienced the thrill of the alpha male often are nearly as chaste as the beta imagines, because they have never been tempted. All they know are a parade of beta males, whom they lash out at occasionally for unwittingly stifling their truest desires, but who, for the most part, they treat in a nontoxic manner that buttresses heavenly notions about their secretive natures. A woman is ever aware of the precariousness of her reputation, and this goes double in rural outposts of heavy religiosity.

And so the beta male has his crimped worldview confirmed by the asexual, undersexual women in his life. But should he ever step outside his empillowed existence… take that daring step into the gritty, grimy world where the female id roams free across fruited plains of phalluses… screw up the courage of heart to face head-on the previously unimaginable… he will find that a bigger universe has existed all along, enveloping the bubble of his life, surging with unleashed energies just out of his reach like uterine aurorae, and if his soul isn’t killed dead right then from shock, he’ll cross the boundary into this new world — he won’t really have a choice — and never look back.

Nor ever again blindly assume the purest of women’s motivations. The stronger among them do with this newfound knowledge the following: acknowledge, accept, incorporate, delimit. He rules his knowledge, but he does not let it rule him.

Such boundary crossing is rare. The beta and alpha male worlds are almost as separate and distinct now as they have been since the dawn of anonymous urban living. Though that is changing.

If betas knew what alphas experience, it would blow their minds. Completely, utterly. Out from under the judgmental Eye of Proper Society, equipped with the requisite beauty to pay the price of admission, the wild female libido is insatiable, crass, debased. It is willing to surrender to the most vile sexual plunderings, screaming in ecstatic pleasure at every enthusiastically welcome violation. Women of the sweetest daytime dispositions and most innocent countenances — smartly coifed women in demure business suits who expound drily on cost-revenue projections and wait tidily in lines for healthy lunch alternatives — will unleash vaginal hell in the arms of alpha lovers, squirting glorious love over dominant men who swap them like baseball cards, presenting like beasts in heat for throbbing units in dank dive bar restrooms, casually spreading as far as they can go in locked office rooms for illicit lovers, giggling in breathy whispers in their lovers’ ear about the clear and present danger of getting caught, deliberately effusing a fake sorrow for the cheated-on boyfriend back home unawares, bemusing wistfully about a history of letting alpha lovers snort coke off her ass while claiming another headache to evade hubby’s entreaties.

Beta males never see this world. To them, it doesn’t exist. And that’s exactly how women want it.
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: OpiXPO on May 12, 2017, 07:35:59 AM
Did your girlfriend tell you "no"?
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: bonedust on May 12, 2017, 09:18:33 AM
As an alpha female I must respond with the obligatory (see I can use big words too) "lol".
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: Z on May 12, 2017, 09:35:38 AM
I always wondered who falls for this type of thing.  It always seems to be the type of guys talked about that fall for it.  Usually there is an associated pick up artist lesson plan that you can buy to learn how to be creepy as fuck.


&feature=youtu.be
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: Güey on May 12, 2017, 12:14:10 PM
Huh?
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: bignasty on May 12, 2017, 09:38:16 PM
BTW, most cops are beta males pretending to be alpha males. That's why they talk women into pressing charges for domestic violence when the women are usually the perpetrators of the violence and that's why they became cops in the first place. They have to at least FEEL like they're an alpha male with their guns and bulletproof vests. Real alpha males don't need weapons or vests, just fists and adrenaline. Fuck a beta ass male police officer.
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: MoeMentim on May 13, 2017, 07:47:20 AM
jesus fucking christ.
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: OpiXPO on May 13, 2017, 12:31:56 PM
BTW, most cops are beta males pretending to be alpha males. That's why they talk women into pressing charges for domestic violence when the women are usually the perpetrators of the violence and that's why they became cops in the first place. They have to at least FEEL like they're an alpha male with their guns and bulletproof vests. Real alpha males don't need weapons or vests, just fists and adrenaline. Fuck a beta ass male police officer.

I wouldn't say usually. They just are more likely to get away with it if both parties say the other started it and the woman say's the guy's injuries are from defensively fighting back. But if the cop has any wits about them, you can identify defense wounds from offense wounds. Or when in doubt, charge them both and let the court decide. And I wholeheartedly disagree with you about the weapons or vests. If your carrying a gun and it's reasonable to wear a vest, then it would be negligent to not to. Getting your gun taken away from you and used against you is a very common and real threat. I don't understand why you would have a problem with body armor. As for the weapons, not every person you run into is going to be willing to engage you in conversation or be talked down. Would you want to be the reason an officer couldn't shoot a hostage taker when said hostage taker has a gun and refuses to talk or listen?

@Brains 2 Guns Next time you quote something in its entirety, you should probably cite the source.
https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2012/03/30/the-reason-beta-males-pedestalize-women/
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: traplord69 on May 13, 2017, 01:11:24 PM
Wow really dude, the only thing that could have made that any worse is the fact that you ripped off word for word the entire diatribe
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: Snout on May 14, 2017, 02:19:04 PM
Like be a junkie wasn't bad enough!
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: Thoms on May 15, 2017, 04:35:52 AM
Jesus Christ, I feel bad if you buy into that bullshit, I mean the parts that weren't just rambling garbage read like a horrible pity party from someone who had to blame someone else for their shortcomings/failures in life. It sounds like you treat women like a pussy holder instead of people. No wonder your love life is miserable.

And about women being to blame for domestic violence. That is pure horse whit, I'm sorry if that happened to you but just because it does doesn't mean that you can just victims blame people. Are the girls who get raped asking for it because they flirt with a guy? Fuck keep blaming cops because they want to see douche bags who abuse women get locked up. Not that they even will as our justice system doesn't treat abuse as harshly as it should.
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: bonedust on May 15, 2017, 07:42:54 AM
^^^Bravo Thoms!
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: bignasty on May 16, 2017, 12:27:08 AM
Fuck cops believing every woman without hearing both sides of the story. Fuck a cop period. Their job is to lock people in cages so I can't respect them in any way or form. Cops should look for true bad guys and not your everyday joe just trying to pay his/her bills. No one should be arrested for weed either. FUCK A COP!!!
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: Esoteric Anhydride on May 16, 2017, 01:00:22 AM
Beta troll is pathetic plagiarist.
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: OpiXPO on May 16, 2017, 03:48:56 AM
This is starting to touch a nerve this time around and I'm not too sure as to why....Bignasty, I get that your ranting, but you're coming off as irrational and just blowing steam. Yes, some cops abuse their power and deserve to get locked up, but not every cop. And society shares a burden of the blame over how law enforcement has evolved in society. The cops don't write the laws that people get locked up for, the politicians that you elect do. And the politicians that you guys elect are the ones who appoint the people who write out officer's standard operating procedure. Venting about how you hate cops doesn't help the situation either. If you really hate what's happening...well...how many times have you reached out to your Representative? Written your Mayor? Made an issue out of it to people who can actually do something about it, rather than just sit here and circle jerk about it.  You can't respect them and I get that, there are a lot of cops I don't respect either. But I also can't respect people who sit around and cluck like a chicken about an issue that has nothing to do with the original topic.

Also, Domestic abuse/assault/battery is actually treated very harshly now. It's one of the very few crimes that are treated nationally as a felony conviction. Most jobs it's a disqualifier- any government job or public office position it is an instant disqualifier. Own a gun? Disqualified. Major bank loans? Disqualified. Drivers license? Some states you lose it. Current and future custodial rights? Bam, gone. Rubber stamped restraining order...The list goes on and on. It's pretty significant.
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: bignasty on May 16, 2017, 04:19:23 AM
This is starting to touch a nerve this time around and I'm not too sure as to why....Bignasty, I get that your ranting, but you're coming off as irrational and just blowing steam. Yes, some cops abuse their power and deserve to get locked up, but not every cop. And society shares a burden of the blame over how law enforcement has evolved in society. The cops don't write the laws that people get locked up for, the politicians that you elect do. And the politicians that you guys elect are the ones who appoint the people who write out officer's standard operating procedure. Venting about how you hate cops doesn't help the situation either. If you really hate what's happening...well...how many times have you reached out to your Representative? Written your Mayor? Made an issue out of it to people who can actually do something about it, rather than just sit here and circle jerk about it.  You can't respect them and I get that, there are a lot of cops I don't respect either. But I also can't respect people who sit around and cluck like a chicken about an issue that has nothing to do with the original topic.

Also, Domestic abuse/assault/battery is actually treated very harshly now. It's one of the very few crimes that are treated nationally as a felony conviction. Most jobs it's a disqualifier- any government job or public office position it is an instant disqualifier. Own a gun? Disqualified. Major bank loans? Disqualified. Drivers license? Some states you lose it. Current and future custodial rights? Bam, gone. Rubber stamped restraining order...The list goes on and on. It's pretty significant.
Yeah, I know and I'm a federal employee! I've also NEVER ABUSED/HIT a woman in my life. I've always supported cops and have met cool ones (DEA or TBN-TN Bureau of Narcotics) that allowed me to go even though I was technically caught with a tank of nitrous in my trunk.

It all comes down to common sense really. If a cop uses common sense, it goes A LONG WAY with me. With the nitrous tank situation, I obviously didn't know the guy I was giving a ride to in the WSP parking lot and they had been watching him selling balloons all night so they let me go. With SOME cops, they'd follow the letter of the law and arrest me since it was technically in MY VEHICLE when they came out guns blazing in their black suits and black boots. The cops that would follow the letter of the law instead of their gut and common sense are the ones I have a problem with.

Same goes with marijuana. I understand it's technically illegal but it's ridiculous to waste taxpayer money when the cop most likely has smoked pot at least once in his life. Have a heart and think with your own brain (not you OpiXPO, just officers in general) instead of blaming the politicians for making the BS laws. If cops and district attorney's would refuse to arrest and prosecute marijuana cases, that would go a LONG way in stopping MJ arrests.

Also, all I can personally do is bitch and rant about it to myself pretty much. That's because I don't have a lot of money and therefore, no power. Unfortunately in this country these days, your words don't really matter much unless you have money. Example: I got in a lot of fights back in the day but only got arrested ONCE when I broke a rich kid's jaw whose stepdad was friends with the judge. It's all about money and who you know. Most poor folks only know other poor folks. Rich folks know other rich folks, ie: the whole purpose for country clubs and other exclusive, expensive clubs or organizations. It's not black and white anymore, it's rich vs. poor. They want us to think it's black vs. white though so we won't realize that they're robbing us blind.

Also, I hear federal prosecutors talking in the elevator at work and they don't even look at poor folks as human beings. You'd be amazed at the things I hear. They're usually rooting for the "defendant/convict" to mess up again when they get probation or a suspended sentence, etc...

As for getting off topic to the OP, that's my fault and I'll take my lumps for that one. Sorry. 
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: Z on May 16, 2017, 05:45:58 AM
Its hard not to feel resentful of the law.  With the encounters we tend to have with them, it seems pretty easy to paint them all with a commercial roller.


I like to say that I don't much like the police, but there are some great cops
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: Brains 2 Guns on August 27, 2017, 12:33:21 PM
What? This isnt me ranting wtf? Its factual that many of the things us males have been taught to do pertaining to what is attractive to a female is flat out false. You can see this everywhere in society. Im not any of the things the ass hurt people here claimed. I have high self-esteem yet admire my faults. I have true confidence yet am very humble. I simply realise that throughout history women have had very little say in man-made constructs that make up "appropriate" societal interactions and standards. On top of that I assume they are very reluctant to speak up when they hear something that is widely agreed about upon men that they find false. I know for a fact a bunch of shit men are told to do are not really things women truly want and or find attracrive. You couldnt handle bringing actual fact and rationale so you decided to diss me. Cool....
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: Chip on August 27, 2017, 02:25:02 PM
not dissing you so much as a healthy conflict of opinion.

i'm still not sure what your point was ... and we are all shaped by our own personal experiences so views may conflict.
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: dillydudeEL14 on August 28, 2017, 09:03:55 PM
Bignasty you're totally right about cops. lol on cops I have seen them flip out and lose their shit over some small dude with a tiny pocket knife when they all have guns and outnumber him. And they actually seemed scared too lol.

I was responding to your first post regarding cops that wanna act tough, I'm not addressing any of the other issues in this thread lol.
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: bignasty on August 30, 2017, 05:29:56 AM
Bignasty you're totally right about cops. lol on cops I have seen them flip out and lose their shit over some small dude with a tiny pocket knife when they all have guns and outnumber him. And they actually seemed scared too lol.

I was responding to your first post regarding cops that wanna act tough, I'm not addressing any of the other issues in this thread lol.
I told/showed a cop that I had a Swiss Army knife one time when he asked me if I had any weapons in the car and he freaked out and put his hand on his gun and told me to drop it. I really thought he was about to shoot me.
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: dizzle on August 30, 2017, 11:05:21 PM
I told/showed a cop that I had a Swiss Army knife one time when he asked me if I had any weapons in the car and he freaked out and put his hand on his gun and told me to drop it. I really thought he was about to shoot me.




I know right?? It's like:


cop: do you have anything that could be considered a weapon on you?


person: yes, sir, I'm going to reach in my pocket slowly with my right hand and pull out a small red swiss army multi-tool, while it's a multi-tool, it does have a 2.5" cutting edge on one of the tools, therefore it can be considered a weapon, so I'm going to get it out and place it on the dashboard within your reach.


**slowly reaches in pocket with other hand on the wheel and lights on in car **


cop: WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU THINK YOUR DOING>!?!?!?!? DROP IT RIGHT NOW 


***shoves gun in persons face***
***radios for backup and swat air support**


**backup arrives**


swat commander (to cop): "Carl, it's a good thing you called us in, this guy could've really caused some carnage with this weapon, I'll put you up for a commendation and we'll get this terrorist off the street"




Police/newspaper prints article about thwarting potential terrorist with knife.


Carl gets a promotion



sounds about right to me. Also, I named the cop Carl. It felt fitting.
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: Raine on September 28, 2017, 01:12:43 PM
This sounds like something that would be in the incel Reddit sub.  Ay yi yii.
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: Z on September 29, 2017, 05:22:48 AM
incel sub is so so so so horrible
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: sk8phaze on October 02, 2017, 05:20:11 AM
@Z wow! I just stopped by the incel reddit sub, talk about the most pathetic,  crybaby, boo-hoo'ing ive [possibly] ever read online. They all are in competition to be the biggesg looser not getting laid. They arr making WAYYYY to big a deal of it. No wonder no girls want them. Ive been voluntarily single for 2.5 years now and i LOVE every second of it. I've had many chances to hook up during my
2.5 year hiatus, maybe some other time, i got a nice fat shot waiting for me 😀 then after that ill be nodding equal to a 3 hour orgasm.lol
Title: Re: Help me decipher this
Post by: Z on October 03, 2017, 06:11:35 AM
Yeah. I don't get it either.  It's a cesspool of victimhood and self loathing.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal