Author Topic: Legal highs did little to curb drug use  (Read 1576 times)

Offline smfadmin (OP)

  • SMF (internal) Site
  • Administrator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Location: Management
  • Posts: 110
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • smfadmin has hidden their reputation power
  • Last Login:Today at 04:27:53 AM
  • Supplied Install Member
Legal highs did little to curb drug use
« on: July 11, 2015, 05:33:56 AM »
from http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/69205645/Legal-highs-did-little-to-curb-drug-use

Legal highs did little to curb drug use ... by Murray Wilson/ FAIRFAX NZ

For parts of 2013 and 2014, a regulated market in legal highs operated in New Zealand.

New Zealand's short-lived experiment with legal highs did little to curb drug use, a survey suggests.

For parts of 2013 and 2014, a regulated market in legal highs operated in New Zealand. The scheme was scrapped and synthetic cannabis banned amid public outcry in May 2014.

Among Kiwis who took part in the Global Drug Survey, more than one in ten (13.5 per cent) of those surveyed said they had used a legal high during the regulated period. Among that group, almost two-thirds (64 per cent) said they carried on using other drugs as they had before. Only one-fifth (21.8 per cent) used less natural cannabis.

"It seems having more drugs available simply led to most existing users adopting a broader range of drugs," survey founder and consultant psychiatrist Dr Adam Winstock said.

"This is perhaps contrary to the outcome the manufacturers - and perhaps the Government - were hoping for, [which was] that these 'legal' drugs would substitute for other non-regulated, untaxed drugs."

READ MORE: Global Drug Survey 2015: Key results for New Zealand

The majority (82 per cent) said they had not used a legal high since the regulated market in them was reversed. However, almost a third (30.1 per cent) said they had started using more natural cannabis after the reversal.

New Zealand Drug Foundation executive director Ross Bell said some Kiwis wanted to get high with whatever was available.

"Kiwis want to get high. And we will get high on whatever we can get our hands on. We don't really discriminate," he said.

The survey, which covered more than 100,000 people worldwide, found that synthetic cannabis was much more likely than natural cannabis to lead to acute health risks.

Ad Feedback

Compared with natural cannabis, synthetic cannabis users reported longer withdrawal symptoms, more rapid onset but shorter duration of effects and more rapid development of tolerance.

"The findings suggest that synthetic cannabinoid products carry a significant and probably greater risk of dependence and withdrawal than natural cannabis products," Winstock said.

"The patterns of withdrawal symptoms is broadly similar to that seen with cannabis withdrawal but with more pronounced physical symptoms including sweating, palpitations and shaking."

Globally, almost three quarters of users smoked synthetic cannabis in a joint with tobacco and 22 percent preferred a bong.

One in every 30 who had used synthetic cannabis in the last year had sought emergency medical treatment - the highest of any drug studied in the survey.
« Last Edit: July 11, 2015, 05:35:57 AM by smfadmin »
measure twice, cut once

Queenofdenial

  • Guest
Re: Legal highs did little to curb drug use
« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2015, 09:14:00 AM »
  Personally, I cannot fathom wanting to smoke synthetic cannabis. I mean I have heard so many negative things about it. Just seems like buying the real thing or growing it yourself is the best and of course all natural way to go.

   Guess a lot of people will try anything to get high. No thanks.

Offline Narkotikon

  • Honest
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • SA_Chat+
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2015
  • Location: USA
  • Posts: 1194
  • Reputation Power: 50
  • Narkotikon has got loads of potential.Narkotikon has got loads of potential.Narkotikon has got loads of potential.Narkotikon has got loads of potential.Narkotikon has got loads of potential.
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:March 28, 2016, 11:31:11 PM
  • Keeping Them Honest
Re: Legal highs did little to curb drug use
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2015, 09:45:33 AM »
The thing that struck me was that they expected users of these legal drugs to quit or decrease their consumption of illegal drugs.  That's just absurd IMO.

I'm not sure how it is there, but in the US the only "legal" drugs are natural weed (if you live in certain states), synthetic weed made with legal (i.e, as-of-yet unregulated) synthetic cannabinoids, kratom (in certain states), and certain unscheduled RC's / pharms, like MXE or etizolam (again, only in certain states / areas).  There are no legal synthetics for all classes of drugs.

It's ignorant to assume that just because someone has legal access to synthetic weed, that they'll stop using cocaine, heroin, meth, etc.  Lots of addicts are poly-drug users.  But most users have a go-to favorite.  I can't see an opiate addict choosing to quit opiates just b/c they can get stoned on legal weed. 

They shouldn't have stopped the regulated, legal experiment.  If anything, they should have widened the scope and legalized other drugs. 
Transparency is necessary to ensure decent staff members get elected. Members need to know when staff are misbehaving, so members can be informed voters.

Offline Chip

  • Server Admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Location: Australia
  • Posts: 5374
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • Chip has hidden their reputation power
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 05:47:30 PM
  • Deeply Confused Learner
Re: Legal highs did little to curb drug use
« Reply #3 on: July 11, 2015, 09:49:29 AM »
the BZP and TFMPP were the most popular and I tried a few whilst holidaying in NZ

they were crappy mimics of stims. and MDMA ... no great loss but the experiment had merit.
Over 90% of all computer problems can be traced back to the interface between the keyboard and the chair !

Tags:
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
1 Replies
1193 Views
Last post November 17, 2015, 01:30:29 AM
by Chip
14 Replies
3310 Views
Last post November 17, 2015, 10:58:05 PM
by Chip
11 Replies
3567 Views
Last post December 27, 2015, 07:49:48 PM
by sk8phaze
1 Replies
1179 Views
Last post February 19, 2016, 01:01:14 PM
by Griffin
14 Replies
3760 Views
Last post June 04, 2016, 10:34:32 PM
by Roman Totale
9 Replies
5683 Views
Last post October 28, 2016, 10:03:02 PM
by mickeyaye6989
5 Replies
1384 Views
Last post September 30, 2016, 03:04:44 AM
by Tainted
26 Replies
4637 Views
Last post September 04, 2017, 04:46:02 AM
by Thoms
0 Replies
761 Views
Last post November 02, 2017, 12:53:15 AM
by Chip
4 Replies
1025 Views
Last post February 03, 2018, 08:52:37 AM
by dizzle




TERMS AND CONDITIONS

In no event will d&u or any person involved in creating, producing, or distributing site information be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, special or consequential damages arising out of the use of or inability to use d&u. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless d&u, its domain founders, sponsors, maintainers, server administrators, volunteers and contributors from and against all liability, claims, damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from the use of any part of the d&u site.


TO USE THIS WEBSITE YOU MUST AGREE TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ABOVE



Founded December 2014