Author Topic: USA/WA - SnoCo Drug Users Will Walk Free if Caught with < than 2 G. of any drug  (Read 304 times)

Offline Chip (OP)

  • Server Admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Location: Australia
  • Posts: 5293
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • Chip has hidden their reputation power
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 01:04:24 PM
  • Deeply Confused Learner
source: http://www.everettpost.com/local-news/snoco-drug-users-will-walk-free-if-caught-with-less-than-2-grams

Friday, March 02, 2018



Drug Users Caught With Less Than 2 Grams Will Not be Prosecuted

Just last week, the King County Prosecutors office announced they will be dropping over fifteen-hundred misdemeanor cases, citing staffing shortages. Now, Snohomish County Prosecutor Mike Roe has announced that that users caught with less than two grams of any drug will not face criminal charges, for very similar reasons. Even methamphetamine, even though the possession of any amount is a felony.

“In 2017 our felony division, with no additional personnel, filed 700 more cases into Superior Court than in 2016. That resulted in caseloads far beyond what our trial deputies can handle effectively. Additionally, when we file more cases our county public defenders, because of the reasonable caseload standards adopted by the Supreme Court, get more attorneys. We do not. We just get further and further behind.”

The goal is to spend more time focusing on higher crimes like assaults, DUIs, property crimes, and burglaries. The only way that persons can be charged for carrying less than two grams is if it’s in relation to a higher crime, such as those previously listed. It’s also important to note that drug traffickers or dealers can be charged with those higher crimes if there’s sufficient evidence to do so. Roe’s statement poses that by allowing users with less than two grams to walk without facing prosecution, their office and resources can be better aligned towards aggressively tackling higher crimes.

The PAO office argues that citing addicts for simply being addicts isn’t helpful to them, is certainly not to our judicial systems, and that addiction issues will be handled by social services and public health industries. If the current model had been helpful in curbing addiction, recidivism would not be such an issue.

They go on to point out that “successful” claims, i.e., when the cited individuals go to jail, pay their fines, and go through probationary periods without violations, are not true successes. Success for an addict is ending an addiction, essentially.

Here is the full statement from the PAO:

In 2017 our felony division, with no additional personnel, filed 700 more cases into Superior Court than in 2016. That resulted in caseloads far beyond what our trial deputies can handle effectively. Additionally, when we file more cases our county public defenders, because of the reasonable caseload standards adopted by the Supreme Court, get more attorneys. We do not. We just get further and further behind.

In many counties across the state, if not most, drug possession cases involving a small amount, even though a felony by law, are commonly handled as misdemeanors. Small fines were imposed that were often not paid, and probation is ordered that is often not complied with. Courts are still understandably reluctant to incarcerate addicts for possessing small amounts of drugs, and even if imposed, jail doesn’t seem to address an addiction problem. Recidivism is near 100%. Addicts will seemingly address their addiction when they decide to, not when we try to force them to. Our office also utilized this “Expedited Misdemeanor” process for many years on these cases, but with negligible effect. Even our “successes” were usually failures, as re-offense was more the rule than the exception.

In short, a prosecutorial response to minor possession cases has apparently done little if anything to curb drug use. What we have been doing on these cases hasn’t been working. What it was doing however, was preventing our deputies from being able to concentrate more fully on Burglaries, Robberies, DUIs, assaults, and the myriad property crimes drug users commit, because we were too busy dutifully charging them, essentially for being addicts in the first place. I have decided to temporarily try letting social service and public health industries try to tackle this social and health problem, and on cases below 2 grams, getting out of their way. I am also hopeful that Sheriff Trenary’s proposed pilot project diversion center has positive results for these people; but what we have done hasn’t.

If other crime actually gets worse, which I highly doubt it will, we will try something else or otherwise reconsider. We historically modify our standards often to reflect our priorities and resources. Under 2 grams of drugs has typically been a low priority criminal case, and at this point is beyond those resources. I learned today that King County is taking similar action on 1500 misdemeanor cases, for essentially the same reason we are taking this step.

Criminal Justice currently consumes over 70% of county general fund resources, and we are constantly reminded of that. It has been made very clear, through this year’s budget process that failed to utilize a property tax increase already approved by voters, that more resources for our office were not going to be forthcoming. It is my job to utilize the resources granted as effectively and efficiently as possible, and live within my means. This charging adjustment is part of that. Something had to give. As we told law enforcement, we will always consider making exceptions if a particular case, in our opinion, does merit the expenditure of resources. This change does not apply to drug dealers or traffickers where we have sufficient evidence to charge those higher crimes. In fact, this step will likely allow us to be even more aggressive on those cases.
Over 90% of all computer problems can be traced back to the interface between the keyboard and the chair !

Tags:
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
0 Replies
776 Views
Last post August 24, 2015, 03:16:13 PM
by Chip
4 Replies
2043 Views
Last post November 16, 2015, 02:22:53 AM
by Thoms
El Chapo caught

Started by jdub « 1 2 » Related Media

29 Replies
5719 Views
Last post January 16, 2016, 05:41:42 PM
by neighbor
1 Replies
1119 Views
Last post March 29, 2016, 12:42:00 PM
by Z
0 Replies
734 Views
Last post March 29, 2016, 05:40:30 AM
by clinton
6 Replies
1482 Views
Last post December 08, 2016, 08:50:49 AM
by MoeMentim
6 Replies
1605 Views
Last post July 20, 2017, 10:05:37 PM
by meal5
4 Replies
1195 Views
Last post July 09, 2016, 11:26:18 AM
by CARNi
3 Replies
1125 Views
Last post December 05, 2016, 02:35:17 AM
by nick
2 Replies
537 Views
Last post February 21, 2018, 02:44:45 AM
by nurse_K




TERMS AND CONDITIONS

In no event will d&u or any person involved in creating, producing, or distributing site information be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, special or consequential damages arising out of the use of or inability to use d&u. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless d&u, its domain founders, sponsors, maintainers, server administrators, volunteers and contributors from and against all liability, claims, damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from the use of any part of the d&u site.


TO USE THIS WEBSITE YOU MUST AGREE TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ABOVE



Founded December 2014