Author Topic: The Truth About China’s Unknown Millions of Drug Users  (Read 519 times)

Offline Chip (OP)

  • Server Admin
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Location: Australia
  • Posts: 5446
  • Reputation Power: 0
  • Chip has hidden their reputation power
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:06:12 PM
  • Deeply Confused Learner
The Truth About China’s Unknown Millions of Drug Users
« on: February 16, 2018, 10:27:45 PM »
source: http://www.sixthtone.com/news/1001599/the-truth-about-chinas-unknown-millions-of-drug-users

The Truth About China’s Unknown Millions of Drug Users [June 2018]

Surveys on drug-taking reveal much more users than officials estimate — and we should adjust our policies accordingly.

As part of an investigation into sexuality in China, I conducted a series of nationwide surveys that targeted 18- to 61-year-olds and included questions about their history of drug use. My results showed that the proportion of men who had tried new drugs increased from 3.4 percent in 2010 to 5 percent in 2015, while women who used new drugs increased from 0.8 percent to 2.1 percent. The oldest person who admitted to using drugs was 50 years old. Therefore, if we discount all participants older than that, then 3.9 percent of all 18- to 50-year-olds have tried new drugs.

As of the end of 2014, China had about 680 million people aged between 20 and 49 years old. We can therefore conservatively estimate that approximately 26 million people from that age group have used drugs at some point in their lives.


Recreational drugs play a decreased social role among Chinese college students. But by the age of 25, people are more likely to have friends who have access to drugs.
- Pan Suiming, professor


Our surveys also confirmed other facts that many Chinese know to be true. For instance, men, young people, and those with less formal education are more likely to use drugs. However, the surveys also showed several unexpected trends that deserve a closer look.

First, it is not true that the younger you are, the more likely you are to take drugs. On the contrary, drug use remains rather low among 18- to 24-year-olds. Instead, 25- to 29-year-olds are 3.3 times more likely than average to have used drugs, while 30- to 34-year-olds are 4.3 times more likely. After the age of 35, the likelihood of drug use falls significantly.

My theory is that the above trends occur because, from their mid-20s to their mid-30s, Chinese people come under great social pressure. As a result, many of them turn to drugs in order to relieve stress. In comparison, young people aged 18 to 24 are often studying at university, just graduated, or working entry-level jobs. As recreational drugs play a decreased social role among Chinese college students, it is less likely that people in this age range would use them. But by the age of 25, people tend to have wide and diverse social networks, meaning they are more likely to have friends who have access to drugs.

Second, it is not entirely true that Chinese people are more likely to use drugs if their educational level is lower. Those who completed primary school or lower are, indeed, nearly 11 times more likely than average to take new drugs, and those who dropped out of high school are 2.8 times more likely. But if you dropped out during middle school or hold a vocational diploma, the probability that you have used drugs is actually lower than average. Therefore, while a lack of formal education can be a factor in drug use, we must remain wary of the stereotype that those who take drugs suffer from a dearth of proper schooling.

The two above trends carry political ramifications. The government clamps down strongly on drug users, but my data raises important questions. For example, are anti-drug campaigns failing those who dropped out of school at the primary level? Given that learning to read and write Chinese characters is an endeavor that continues long after primary school, are those who drop out at a young age unable to understand state-sponsored anti-narcotics literature? If so, then the government’s anti-narcotics drives should create NGOs specifically tasked with targeting the underlying issues of this group.

Third, there is a link between solitude and taking new drugs, but it is difficult to distinguish the cause and the effect. Those who have few social relationships, rarely go out, or regularly drink heavily are 2.3 to 5.7 times more likely to use drugs than people who have wide social networks and drink in moderation. But it is unclear whether their drug-taking drives them into these habits, or whether they take drugs after first living under these conditions for an extended period of time.

Over the last two years, a social group known as the “empty-nest youth” has received a lot of media attention in China. The term refers to young urbanites who generally live alone and lack significant interpersonal relationships. But if this emerging lifestyle pushes certain people into illegal drug-taking, how should both society and the state reach out and help young, isolated drug users?

There is, however, a definite correlation between the use of new drugs and sexual activity. Certain effects of new drugs — such as increased empathy, euphoria, and heightened sensation — are considered desirable in certain sexual situations. My surveys show that people who use drugs are three times more likely to have multiple sexual partners and five times more likely to solicit the services of sex workers. But we can also turn this situation around and say that certain people rely on drug use as a way to maintain sexually liberal lifestyles. Regardless of the cause and effect, however, the outcome remains the same: Drug users are over 15 times more likely than average to contract a sexually transmitted disease.

The number of drug users in China increased substantially from 2010 to 2015. There is no evidence to suggest that the figure will stop growing or decrease. Drug use is, of course, a global issue, but we nonetheless know very little about China’s drug users. We must therefore continue to undertake in-depth surveys into their habits and behavior, and adjust our anti-narcotics policies to help them in the best way we can.
Over 90% of all computer problems can be traced back to the interface between the keyboard and the chair !

Tags:
 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
8 Replies
1524 Views
Last post June 18, 2015, 11:32:38 PM
by Zoops
10 Replies
2846 Views
Last post September 28, 2015, 03:14:40 AM
by theSWPK
7 Replies
2095 Views
Last post October 22, 2015, 09:52:07 AM
by Narkotikon
4 Replies
1798 Views
Last post November 19, 2015, 05:17:13 PM
by theSWPK
1 Replies
1123 Views
Last post February 04, 2016, 01:26:59 AM
by Guts
1 Replies
934 Views
Last post July 10, 2016, 10:16:42 PM
by theSWPK
10 Replies
2597 Views
Last post January 04, 2017, 10:48:12 PM
by Lolleedee
0 Replies
945 Views
Last post December 10, 2016, 01:41:42 AM
by Chip
4 Replies
1675 Views
Last post December 28, 2016, 10:14:26 AM
by Spiral
0 Replies
754 Views
Last post September 10, 2017, 07:01:52 AM
by Chip




TERMS AND CONDITIONS

In no event will d&u or any person involved in creating, producing, or distributing site information be liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, punitive, special or consequential damages arising out of the use of or inability to use d&u. You agree to indemnify and hold harmless d&u, its domain founders, sponsors, maintainers, server administrators, volunteers and contributors from and against all liability, claims, damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from the use of any part of the d&u site.


TO USE THIS WEBSITE YOU MUST AGREE TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ABOVE



Founded December 2014