📝 checkpoint_cells_rna_amino_acids.mdv4.6.5 · 2026-11-06

Checkpoint, 12 Nov 2026: cells, RNA, amino acids, immunity and "living = motion"

Settled facts

Positions held, with my verdict

Position Verdict
RNA predates proteins but became a viable genetic code only once its bases were tied to amino acid links Holds as a claim about the code (the stereochemical theory). Lab RNA can copy itself a little without peptides, so it fails as a claim about heredity. The binding evidence covers about 8 amino acids, and the transfer RNA adapter is still needed for assembly.
Once the minimal set-up exists it can be extended easily True at the edges (selenocysteine, pyrrolysine, lab-added amino acids), but the core 20 are frozen.
The replication system is an immune function and the instigator of gene transfer Not supported. Parts of the copying machinery are parasite-derived, and mobile elements are the main instigators. Defence is a leading reason transfer stays open, and it also filters it.
Every gene was born of an immune or replication need Only in a narrow form. Many genes come from parasite DNA (syncytin, RAG, Arc), but metabolic and structural genes trace to chemistry and energy.
Ageing is gene termination True for salmon, octopus and annual plants. For most animals ageing is selection neglecting the late years.
Amino acids are central, ubiquitous and immutable Central and ubiquitous yes. Immutable only after the code froze, since they are modified chemically after construction.
Living = motion Better as organised, self-maintaining motion that can reproduce. A dormant seed is the same machinery switched off.

Where we ended up agreeing

Open for the next chapter

  1. When did the amino acid and RNA loop close, meaning when a system first made its own amino acids?
  2. What share of genes trace to parasite or defence material? That could test the narrow form of the every-gene claim.
  3. A tighter wording of "living" that handles dormancy.